Who Owns the Land?

Do you own a piece of land ‘property’?  Do you know someone that does?  How is it that property was transferred from an original owner to you?  Where did that person obtain the rights to that property?  How far back can we go until we find the original owner of the land property?

Does Federal own the lands of North America?  They sure do act like they do.  If they can tax anyone for anything, arrest anyone and create the laws to charge them with, post facto, or just send the military machine to blow up whoever they want to whatever extent they want, then they must own something.  But then again, where did Federal acquire its titles to landholdings?

We know for a fact that men lived on the North American continent long before the banker’s missions killed them all.  Despite the attempts to degrade the existence of these men, with terms like blood-thirsty savages and redskins, they were actually men, with a symbiotic civilization that treated the land as the most prized possession, and each other with reverence.  These aboriginals never claimed to own any land, but yet they were constantly hounded to sign treaty admitting to such in order to keep the invaders at bay.  Sooner or later, even treaty got in the way, and so the age-old formula of inciting violence as an excuse for war ensued, and genocide was then justifiable.

So now we have a system of governments and banks, backed by religions and sciences, claiming ownership of lands that none of these entities has a bit of legitimacy over.  How can the ownership of any property be valid if that property was stolen from murdered men?  If you are one to applaud the right of conquest, then perhaps it would be OK if armed thugs broke down your door, shot you dead, enslaved your family and laid claim to all your former possessions.  Don’t believe that can happen, that you live under the protection of the big boy on the block?  That big boy has proven time and again that it can and will destroy anyone for any twisted reason it deems necessary.

There used to be an open claim of divinity by monarchy (government), and of course there still is by pope and priest.  Nothing could be farther from the truth.  These claims are made so that factions of men can have ownership over things and not have to produce an original title, or prove that the holdings were obtained justifiably.  Through the claim of divine right, men can say ‘god said so’ without having to prove that God did anything.  Then, using force of arms, these same men can commit divine conquest (AKA Crusades, national security) against any people that dare not pay tribute to their holiness.

Government, in this day and age, is the new god.  Governments, under the authoritative guise of symbols written on parchment can claim universal dictate.  All that must be done is to write more symbols on more papers making it so.  There are many apologists out there that claim the necessity of government to represent men and their property, but a closer examination reveals that these same men take advantage of the relationship, and profit from the criminal actions.  These are the protectors of government.  These are the men that applaud war and police power over the people.  They fly their war flags in everyone’s face, demanding their brand of patriotism from the masses, under penalty of death for non-compliance.  It is these men that expect their piece of the pie at any cost, men that will stand by and delight at the harm and murder of anything that might hinder their profit margin.  Most are deluded into the idea that the government machine will take their side if push comes to shove.  When that time comes, they will be sadly mistaken as the top levels of the murder for money game show no quarter to anything below them.

Which brings the entire argument to this.  The Federal Government, the State Governments, in fact any government, has absolutely no valid claim to ownership of anything.  Oh sure, there are some slimeball lawyers that will create words on paper, have some fraud sign it and then call it title or deed.  Those words mean nothing.  Under that auspice some men can simply write down legal words and take anything they want, including life and liberty of living men.  These words carry no authority because the claim to ownership is through ill-gotten gains, namely murder, theft and fraud.  Additionally, the system behind the words, government and we the people are fictional entities.  They simply do not exist in reality, only on paper, stacked up in a mile-high grim fairy tale.  We the people does not include living men, how could it?  If we the people were real, and all inclusive, all men would be fully informed of everything, gain an equal share of everything, have as full an authority as any other man.  Government would then be completely transparent and completely accessible.  But we know that is not true, and that we the people are used as an excuse for those claiming ownership of the people and land to violate any and every ethical purpose they deem fit.  Ultimately, fictional government represents fictional we the people.  Through this relationship, they claim ownership over lands and property, ownership that is fraudulent. 

If government owns the land, then I demand to see proof of original title that they received such ownership from.  An original owner must have transferred ownership to the current proprietors in order for the claim to be valid.  We know this is not true.  Not only were the people living on the land systematically murdered, and the land they lived on seized, but whatever claim those murdered people had existed between them and God.  Does government have proof of transfer from God to government the ownership of the land?  Of course not, though I am sure that any group of lawyers will gladly draft up some fraudulent legal crap that purports such a transfer, complete with god’s signature.

The truth is that the only thing government has to back up it’s claims is weapons and fear.  The very second living men deny government their claim of ownership over lives and property, those men are attacked in any number of ways.  Government has made sure, through its educational system and media propaganda machine, that its first line of defense is the very people it subjugates.  They back the fraudulent claim by exhorting it as truth.  And through that action, they grant government the power to do anything, expecting of course that it will ultimately profit them to do so.  Those that back murderous government are complicit in its crimes.  Those that perpetuate the lies that fictional things are real are insane. 

They know that if government cannot produce honorable claim to property, then they too will have no valid claim to their property.  It will be the end to the American way of take what you can, while you can, from whoever you can, at any cost, including murder.  The nation was founded upon it.

Rights, Privilege and Law

How is it that rights can be granted that are already inherent in natural law, and as natural rights?  The constitution, and the Bill of Rights are wonderful idealism, but in reality neither has an ounce of power and the Federal government is proof of that.

Are the rights of men to be compounded into 10 little amendments, all of which are completely open to interpretation, in order to exist?  In my estimation, those rights are a beginning to restriction of government.  But government, namely Federal, has made sure it has no restriction, and the 'rights' supposedly handed down by the founding fathers are revoked 100 times over, the Federal bureaucrats just haven't seen fit to enforce the laws claiming them so yet.

Unless you live in TV lala land, which is quite likely in this end of age, you would be well aware that there are more than 80 million Federal statutes, codes and by-laws, all in violation of the constitution, and all in violation of the rights of living men.  It is this way because corporate governments run by bankers have no empathy, care or feeling, and view 'citizens' as property; cattle, sheep, dogs and as long as we bleat and moo and bark, they are happy to do so. Property has no right, it has privilege. Governments provide privilege and expect hearty payment, via energy labor, in order to grant it.  We essentially pay in a form of taxation 10x over so that government can control every part of our lives.  These bureaucrats dole out privilege in exchange for the alleviation of the very fears they create with their policies of discontent.

It all falls back on the belief that the constitution is a social contract.  Contract exists only under certain conditions: complete and full disclosure, no coercion in its agreement, terms are satisfactory and unchanging for all parties involved, and all parties agree via witnesses or a mark of some kind, like a signature.  The constitution is an agreement between a fictional 'we the people' and a fictional 'government'.  Neither exists in fact, it cannot, as it has no energy on its own.  Each must suck the energy of living men in order to exist.  It is also why the social contract can be changed without notification or acceptance of protest any time the purveyors of gun and propaganda wish it.  As grand as the idea that the there is a supreme law of the land is, that supreme law is butt-wipe for filthy rich extortionists and murderers, hell bent on taking everything and giving nothing but a dirt nap to anyone that stands in their way.

You cannot rely on revolution. Revolution replaces government with government, and unless I missed it somewhere, all governments throughout known history are top-down pyramid schemes of extortion and suffering.  Federal is no different.  In fact, it may be the greatest pyramid scheme government ever contrived.  But like all pyramid schemes, ultimately it collapses in on itself.

Here's the deal.  You are the determiner of your rights.  You determine the law. It is only the incompetent man that needs others to dictate control.  Is that you?  Don't you know the difference between right and wrong?  If not, then perhaps you do need to be enslaved to keep you from harming others.  Which comes to the only law that needs to be known or practiced: Do no harm to life, any life.  I cannot conceive of any law necessary outside of that or in addition to that, because all law is just a fracturing of the law of one.

Blah Ram U.S.A

“Consider, for instance, the problems involved in persuading a traditionally pastoral people to use the plow.  Their previous image is one in which the life giving grass grows spontaneously over the landscape and is preserved and utilized to feed the livestock on which the whole society depends.  The very first step of the new process is to plow the grass under, to destroy the familiar life giving green carpet and replace it by a waste of barren earth.  Not until the seed is planted, is grown, and yields its crop, will the new image be firmly implanted and in the meantime the old image which has served generation upon generation must ruthlessly be destroyed or devalued.”

-Kenneth Boulding, The Image- Knowledge in Life and Society

Is this what is happening to the U.S.A., Canada, and the West?  Are we now a ‘pastoral people’, and have been for some time now? Not in the true definition of the word, as shepherds on the grass covered plain, but as wanderers tending the same paths and having the same expectation, regardless of dire circumstances in clear view on the horizon?  Maybe, in the pastoral sense, we are the sheep, being tended by the shepherds, shepherds who know without a doubt that the grass that has fed their flocks for generations is in imminent failure.  We the sheep just eat and bleat with the expectation that the grass has always been there and always will.

I saw Mr. Boulding’s passage above and wondered if the failed constitutional experiment is being plowed under, since it has become unsustainable in nearly every way it needs to sustain itself, at least in the capitalistic consumer driven form it has morphed into.  I will fully accept that that is going to happen whether purposefully or not, but the machine and purpose behind that plowing under is what is giving me pause. 

I think that an original plowing under probably took place in 1776 through 1810, wherein a group of rich men was able to publish declaration and writ with such magnificence that it compelled a people to abandon homeland and traditional rule of the divine right of kings in favor of government that had never been attempted at this level.  That one fantastic change in public perception of the rights of the governed versus the governors was a monumental step forward in the evolution of societal image and thought.  Unfortunately, it was a short lived one, as the original owners of all things they could point a gun at used incredible patience, political manipulation and the tactics of economic subversion to incite civil war, and create a theater of compromise in the original social contract that has caused its degradation ever since.  What is the most amazing thing to record in all of this, is that even up to today, despite every kind of egregious action against the constitution, with every conceivable excuse attached, there is still a solid image in the mind of the general populace that the constitution still carries the full power and support that it did in 1810, or any other period in the nation’s history.  This despite the fact that a majority of the populace couldn’t even begin to comprehend the document in whole or part, as ignorance of fact is the bliss that keeps the boogie men (or wolves) away.  And if the majority relies on others to understand and uphold the social contract, they are much farther away from seeing the yet to be released torrent of laws to crush the constitution and its image to dust in a very short period of time, if not already.

My concern in all of this isn’t in the plowing under, per se.  Like I stated above, I don’t believe this system of economics, politics, and relationship to ecology are the least bit sustainable.  Major catastrophes like Chernobyl, the Gulf of Mexico disaster, and Fukushima are but the advertised poisoning of the planet earth, while the full extent of poisoning, were it revealed, would be staggering to comprehend.  My concern is that those promoting the plowing under have no reason for it other than to kill off a majority of the flock in the most efficient manner without having to actually bloody their own hands with the slaughtering knife.  Then the plan is to retain the bare minimum of the herd until the conditions of the grassland become favorable again, so the whole cycle can be started anew.

Essentially, a truth to be held self evident, is that a small fraction of people consider themselves to be divine above the rest, and hold that they should reap reward and profit at every turn, no matter the circumstance, at whatever cost to the rest or to life.  As long as one king (or queen) is living in a palace on a hill, you can have confidence that there is a network of slimeball bureaucrats, lawyers and bankers creating the image that the royalty is necessary, and keeping themselves high on the hog, or in this instance, sheep.  There is an ingrained mindset there, one that is impenetrable, that has forever been the privileged and will forever be the privileged, no matter the circumstances or consequence.  Even if it means the ultimate extinction of all life on the planet earth, that is a small price to pay for the self anointed to keep their posh lives and command over everything, right up until they are the last person alive to rule over whatever nightmare they survey.

So here is the test.  Can enough images of individual as master be converted to survive the plowing under, to take a contingent of men, not sheep, and survive not only the plowing under, but the final elimination of false prophet, king, president, czar, emperor, pope, and the rest of the profiteers and destroyers of life?  This doesn’t mean the end to leadership, or organisation, but instead means an absolute end to privilege and accumulation of wealth through the guise of leadership. 

I have little doubt that a great many sheep are going to be harvested in the coming transition of ages.  I sadly say that for the most part it is deservedly so, as they are sheep of their own choosing, no matter the nationality, race, creed, color, culture or the like.  The sheep are those that are constantly looking to the shepherd for guidance in all of their life’s affairs, and obey the directions of that shepherd without a bleat of objection. 

These are not the actions of a man.  A man is a spiritual, intellectual and self-sufficient being.  A man is divine in his own right and development.  A sheep is a follower of whim based on elimination of fear, that sees the divine only outside itself.  A man fears not death yet cherishes his life in the fullest.  A sheep knows only what is shown and told to him, and is an unthinking grazer on the plains of desperation.  A man is in constant doubt of situation, and thus is always seeking a situation that greater benefits him in tandem with all life.  A sheep knows only that which is shown or fed to it, and rests easy knowing the shepherds are close by to save it from any calamity.  A man knows no end, only transition, and ascension as a spiritual being in an organic body, and lives firmly right here, right now. A sheep knows only the beginning and the end, and allows the in-between to be dictated by strangers.

Human Needs vs. Government

If you asked most people what would make their life complete, they might respond with things like: to be independently wealthy, or own a nice car or home or go on a vacation, or to find a significant other, a spouse and maybe have a family. There are underlying principles behind all of these things and most other ‘material’ answers. People look for wealth because they equate it with peace of mind and joy. People look to things like cars and vacations because they equate it with joy. People look to relationships and family because there they will find joy and love.

In the most basic form, people seek to find peace, joy and love. I think it’s apparent that material things can’t provide sustained joy or peace, and unless you love yourself first, relationships and family are not going to cut it. Really, peace, joy and love all come from within; these cannot be provided from an outside source for any extended length of time. Even ‘Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness’ are riders on the basic human (spiritual) needs of peace, love and joy.

In no way, shape or form can any government provide peace, joy or love. If you examine the machinations of government in any time period of the history told to us, you will find that government is the opposite of providing these things. It is necessary for government to take these things away under the guise of providing them in order for government to survive and grow. The carrot of peace, love and joy being lead before the horse of humanity is hung from a stick that is fear, hate, enemies, war, angst, anguish, worry and stress. We know that we can never reach the carrot as long as the stick is there, but for some reason we believe that the stick has purpose, and without it the carrot would disappear.

I keep seeing sales pitches. I keep hearing slogans. I keep finding that my enemies are declared for me, as are my allies, and they are always nations or factions or organizations that threaten government. And I keep seeing the same loop that I see in every organization, a loop wherein the many are lead to meet the goals of organization, always to their behest and dissatisfaction (lack of peace, joy and love) and always to the profit of organization and the few that command it. It’s a 'give this of yourself and you might get this back, but don’t count on it'.

It is my heartfelt belief that if we, as intelligent creatures of mind, heart and spirit do not break away from the covenant that government is absolute and necessary we will have set the stage for our permanent demise. Every man, woman and thing we ‘vote’ into office under the promises and salvations that this time it will be different, has harmed Americans and the planet in heart, mind and soul to a greater degree than did the officers preceding. If my mind is sold on the truth that government is a necessary thing, and my mind tells my heart this, yet my heart knows that government is anti-peace, joy and love, then inevitably I will suffer, as will the vast majority of the populace. I hate to sound so new age wishy-washy, but governments are lies in my mind and that is something my heart can believe in.

Deceivers, Spell Casters, and a Willing Consciousness

I think there is a definite game involved in deception. On one hand the deceivers have to make it known, in some form, that an event can or will happen. It's the old adage hidden in plain sight. This is how the spell is cast, and how the collective consciousness comes to accept a lie, or dis-believe the truth. Since the idea of what the deception might be is put out in a sort of low level buzz, the direction the deception intends people to look will seem obvious and acceptable to them at the time.

The other side of this is that there cannot be an awareness of an event by any notable amount of the populace or the event has to be scrapped. That is because if there is foreknowledge then a group of people can say, "we knew this was going to happen and told people about it!" This breaks the spell, since now people will want to investigate and find out how some people knew something beforehand, yet they did not. This is why all of these occultist dates keep coming up and more and more people are researching every single step of the political and (d)elite to figure out what they are going to pull this time. Since the collective is then abuzz with awareness that a certain date is primed and ready for some kind of planned shock and awe, the spell is ineffective and there is a greater chance that the true perpetrators will be found out.

If we use 911 as an example, there was warning of this that people have now dug up in hindsight. There are even government studies of this exact type of terror attack, planes flying into buildings, yet if we remember everyone in Federal shrugged their shoulders and said we had no idea. Some loon even crashed his Cessna into the Whitehouse in 1994, if that’s not an indicator, I don’t know what is.

It's interesting to note that intelligence and investigatory agencies were completely clueless this kind of thing could happen, yet in 48 hours they knew everything, including the names and nationalities of every hijacker, and their comings and goings for the previous year. This is despite there being next to zero physical evidence to prove anything. The public bought it hook, line, and sinker, and while there are rumblings about it being an inside job by quite a large percentage of Americans, the spell is cast, and it is still in force, and it is still working to the benefit of those that cast it.

This was a perfect spell. The whole event was made to order acceptable by a willing populace. It caught the commoner by complete surprise, shocked him into acceptance and submission, and allowed an objective of global attack against sovereign nations to ensue. It essentially gave Federal the green light to do any damn thing they wanted to, and they took complete advantage of that pass, and then took complete advantage of the American people as well.

The people that are deemed 'conspiracy theorists' are really people trying to break spells that have been cast on the people. It is a daunting and impossible task in this current level of frequency that the human consciousness is in. I truly believe that in the next years time that frequency level of vibration is going to change, and increase. If this happens, a greater cross section of humanity is going to wake up and break out of the spells, and have a heightened awareness of everything, including deceptive intent, and those beings around us that are forever stuck in the psychopathic low-level manifestations of sadistic gratification will be revealed.

The Non-existent Contract with the Non-existent Constitution

What is your contract with the Federal Government? Is it the constitution? Let me ask you, when did you become a party to this contract? Is there some paper you signed, a hand you shook, a verbal commitment you made that I am not aware of? If so, I would like to know the means of that agreement, because from what I can tell I am not part of any constitutional contract.

Even if I say I believe and follow and swear to uphold the constitution, does that mean that anyone else has? I don’t think anyone has, ever. There are no signatures on the constitution. It hasn’t gone on a nationwide tour to gain the acceptance of the consenting public. For all intents and purposes, it is archived in a place called, you guessed it, the National Archives.

Do the political elect uphold the constitution, as they purport to with their hand on the bible? If so, then why are they constantly looking for ways to subvert it for themselves and their friends? Why are there millions of laws that are in violation of any number of constitutional amendments, Bill of Rights or otherwise?

Can you be born into subservience to a government? Then can’t you also be born into a plantation owner’s unquestionable authority? Is it the voting part that is throwing you off? Then how can a stranger that you have never met re-present you as a living man? Is this person reporting back to you on a daily basis to get your input and consent, to fill you in on how the next law on the stack of millions of laws is going to make your life so much better?

What about the appointed offices, which make up a vast majority of the government, and are the people that really write the laws, create the agencies, and spend the money. What is their contract with the constitution, and what is their oath to the people? Don’t they act with impunity, outside of being caught with a live boy or a dead girl?

What is the limitation that is put on their law creation if it is not the constitution? Couldn’t they make a law that states that the firstborn daughter is to be delivered to the local politicos for rape initiations? Do you think psychopaths have never accomplished divine right before now? How about if they just start the draft up again, full throttle, and kill off all the young men from 18 to 30 in some cannon fodder wet dream of death? We’ve seen that one already. I mean, really, where is the limitation of their authority? They say, “our bullshit mumbo jumbo says this,” and living, breathing men are supposed to bow down and start licking boots?

What is the limit you would put forth in your mind? Is it hearing about men, women and children in another town accosted, only to disappear forever without explanation or trial? Is it when you see your neighbor loaded onto a truck by whatever god-forsaken paramilitary forces, his wife screaming and his dog shot dead on the lawn? Or is it when you are finally approached?

There is already so much constitution ending legislation on the books it is not even funny. The entire Federal political, legislative and judicial scene is on board. They don’t believe in rights. There is more of that coming. If you can’t pay attention or don’t want to, then continue to pay tribute until it’s desperation time.

Remember, there is no constitution because there is no agreement. All terms between men are based on consent and contract. It is either that way or any corporation can march right in, take all your shit, and leave you a bloody mess simply because they want to. If that is a constitutional republic, then we deserve it.

The D, The R, and the You...

The D, The R, and the You...subtitled the Ugly, the Bad, and the Good...

I enjoy the banter between the partisans on either side of the aisle in this 2 party Federal government. I have to enjoy it, because despising things just generates the negative, mind clogging emotions that just plain zap the life out of you. I think the most entertaining thing is that a change from this man to this man, or no change at all, is somehow going to make matters all better. If that were the case, then it would have happened in the last 50 election cycles, through which every conceivable combination of D and R mish-mash has occurred and still the downward trend on the graph of middle class American life has ensued.

If this nation were operating according to the prescriptions put forth by the constitution, the presidency and congress would have far less impact and power. America would be a republic instead of the top down single point of all decision-making oligarchy that it is. There would be localized and accessible domestic power of state and local government, and the diversity of the separate republics would dictate strength and fiscal responsibility.

Washington is only accessible to Washington. It is a district in a foreign land where dictations spew forth from bankers, lawyers and statesman, people that have absolutely no stake in your life or anyone else's but their own. They have farm sold the economy to foreign bankers 100 years ago and have created every possible type of bastardized law against the people that their twisted little doublespeak minds can nightmare up.

Vote change, vote status quo, it makes no difference in my estimation. The pace of degeneration in everything the Federal government gets its grubby hands on is at critical mass, and the world we believe exists is untenable. It is this way because men are expected to deceive as their employment, and we the people look for the best deceiver, and champion that person as re-presentative of ourselves. The people we choose to admire from afar are people that we do not know and would never be allowed to know. What we do know of them is cleverly scripted bites of doublethink that we are so desperate to hear, and know it’s a lie as we hear it, yet still believe it as our own moment to moment gospel of salvation. These teleprompted spells become the image of them to such a degree that we will fight against and betray the very people we know and love if they dare to question that image in the least.

One of the greatest disappointments of this presidency is an extension of the disaster that was the last. If anyone wants a fiscal turnaround in America then step A (and the only step IMHO) is to end the war machine. There is no greater expenditure, and no greater waste of life and capital, with absolutely zero benefit to the citizens on either side of the conflict. I’m sure there are pundits out there pointing fingers at every nation but their own, screaming national security and global peacebombing necessities. For those so entrenched in the value of the military industrial complex, there’s an old saying that goes, live by the sword, die by the sword. The Federal government that is living by the sword can only survive with your participation, with your labor as their credit, your capital as their card, and your vote for whichever of the two previously chosen candidates as a clear sign that you still believe that your life matters in their world.